Header image

The Last Remnant

PC review by Patrick Coakley on 5th April 2009

When I first heard that Square-Enix was actually bringing a JRPG to the PC, they certainly caught my attention. While I’m not the biggest fan of the genre, I did like the prospect of playing The Last Remnant with a keyboard and mouse due to my preference to those over a controller. Being one of the few games from Japan that actually uses the Unreal Engine allowed Square’s latest high-budget game to be brought over with no trouble. But what good is a great PC port of a sub-par console game anyways?

screenshot

Yes, there is a story in The Last Remnant. And yes, it’s really stupid. This genre truly hasn’t progressed in the art of story-telling, and the weak exposition doesn’t exactly start things off right. You play as Rush Sykes, a generic teenager looking for his lost sister. He is welcomed to the kingdom of Athlum, where the king, David, decides to help him in his task. Oh yeah, there’s also cat and fish people, the former of which look very similar to the Thundercats, but with four arms. There’s not much else to say other than the title is a reference to “remnants”, ancient artifacts that come in various shapes and forms, and each one is basically assigned to the rulers of the different cities in the game’s world.

The biggest problem with The Last Remnant is perhaps the combat system. While it had some interesting concepts, the execution feels weak and under-developed. A new system utilizing Unions, which are small groups of characters spread out on the battlefield, are the most interesting new idea here, but it doesn’t truly feel like they add any depth to how you play games in the genre, and ultimately they’re there to just keep battles going. While it does allow for huge battles, it also just means you have to manage more characters in an unorganized fashion.

screenshot

Then there’s the idea of using quick-time events while fighting, which has been done before. However, the randomness and the way the game inconsistently lets you even do it doesn’t compare to the way this concept works in games like Mario & Luigi, etc, where you simply just time your button presses; it has no real purpose in this game since you can let the computer do it for you automatically anyways in the options. There is also a vagueness to how the combat itself works, and there is very little decision-making in the way of what you want your characters to do.

Visually The Last Remnant is a fairly nice looking game, though unfortunately there’s still some pop-in since it uses the UE3. When cranked up to the highest settings at a high resolution, the game becomes very easy on the eyes. The art itself is a mixed affair; some characters looking like one style and others looking like an entirely different person designed them. One thing that is consistent is the environments, which are all boring and without imagination. I was really hoping that by using a different engine that the game would be showing off something less static, but it seems that you can only expect so much from Japanese developers when it comes to using technology to its fullest at this point.

screenshot

By far the best part about The Last Remnant’s movement to the PC is the control customization. I am quite pleased that I was able to tweak everything to the point where it felt like I was playing an MMO, allowing me to play without too many issues. The camera is a problem, though, and it’s very aggravating when you use the mouse to rotate the camera only to have it bounce away and have you looking in a different direction. This causes problems when exploring narrow areas, where you might be heading in the opposite direction if you don’t pay attention to the mini-map. There is support for standard controllers, but obviously there’s emphasis on using the 360 controller.

Honestly, Last Remnant is just another JRPG with a fresh coat of paint and a few unfinished ideas. The core of the game still revolves around choosing attack in the menu and waiting for your battles to finish. There is no charm, no hook, and no reason to play this game outside of wanting to play a Japanese RPG on your PC with nice graphics. The one upside is that maybe more developers will attempt to port more of the genre to the PC, but hopefully they bring something more worthy to a platform that has a sizeable amount of role-playing games that are creative and memorable.

Four out of ten

Pros

  • Great graphics powered by UE3
  • Tons of control customization

Cons

  • Everything else

Spread the word

About the author

Patrick Coakley is a Staff Writer at Thunderbolt, having joined in February 2008.

Comments

  • Julian

    7th April 2009

    Gravatar

    You can turn off the camera auto follow…

  • Jungle Jim

    7th April 2009

    Gravatar

    Actually, that’s not what I was referring to. I was talking about the camera pushing itself off the walls in narrow places.

  • Syrion

    8th April 2009

    Gravatar

    4/10 as in the same score as Hard to be a God or skifree on this site? Man you must really hate JRPGs and then I wonder what’s the point of reviewing one…

  • Meh

    11th April 2009

    Gravatar

    And you call this a review ?
    You barley know the differences trough personal opinion ad a objective review .. hell …

  • blimp

    12th April 2009

    Gravatar

    I assume you consider the difference between the two “I agree” and “I disagree”?

  • Master Chen

    12th April 2009

    Gravatar

    “And you call this a review ?
    You barley know the differences trough personal opinion ad a objective review .. hell … “

    AHAHAHAHHAH
    So now reviews aren’t opinions now? LOL what world do you live in? Yes, I love reading reviews where it’s just a giant press release with all the features and points of a game. Seriously get outta here.

  • Andy

    21st April 2009

    Gravatar

    So tell me why someone who reviews mostly mindless fighting games is reviewing a JRPG?

    SURPRISED that it has a low score?

  • Waukeen

    25th April 2009

    Gravatar

    WOW….and here I was expecting a half was unbiased review. Found out that wasnt the case after reading the first paragraph. Then what sealed the deal was the comment about MMOs. If you want to play an MMO play an MMO dont judge a game to an MMO when ITS NOT.

    You Mr. Reviewer….are an idiot

  • Brumbek

    7th May 2009

    Gravatar

    I have to greatly disagree with your review. 4/10 is so ludicrous for a game of Last Remnant’s caliber. I also echo that you must hate JRPGs or something…

    I find this game incredibly addictive and have played for MANY hours and I don’t have a single problem with the battle system. I set up my unions so that I’ve only once or twice in the hundreds upon hundreds of battles I’ve fought ever wished for more options.

    So no offense, but maybe you just aren’t good at figuring this game out? The game forces you to think strategically in developing your unions precisely because it limits your choices in battle.

    Anyway, it’s really pathetic that you give such a low score to this game. You have a right to your opinion, even though it’s very, very wrong.

    I urge all readers here to NOT regard this review as accurate but rather the result of a flawed reviewer, not game!

  • Nick Akerman

    7th May 2009

    Gravatar

    “You have a right to your opinion, even though it’s very, very wrong.”

    That’s your opinion. His is different. Get over it.

  • Me

    7th May 2009

    Gravatar

    Horrible review.

  • Sean

    8th May 2009

    Gravatar

    Hmmm, it appears this game has a game rankings average of a shade over 60%, that would mean his opinion is only 20% wrong. I’d consider 20% well out of the ‘very, very wrong’ territory.

    Or in easier terms, the consensus is the game is barely better than average and Mr. Patrick deemed the game barely below average.

    What a huge difference.

  • fedehb

    14th May 2009

    Gravatar

    Pathetic review. You didn’t spend more than three or four hours playing the game. I’m personally not a big fan of JRPGs, but there’s a lot more in The Last Remnant than what you can imagine reading this article.

  • Myst

    14th November 2009

    Gravatar

    pleease, there’s a lot of differences between MMO and JRPG.
    if you don’t understand the system of JRPG’s games, than don’t review it!

  • AMyung

    16th December 2009

    Gravatar

    A little lacking immersion wise, but really, a four?
    Man up haha

  • Rush

    20th February 2011

    Gravatar

    Got this game in a bundle of Square Enix games. Not very impressed. The default controls tell you to press X button or A button, directly from the Xbox. They couldn’t be bothered to make this game a little optimized for PC? It’s DIRECTLY ported from the Xbox, and I’m not impressed at all.

    As for the game itself, it’s awful. If you have played the newest Star Ocean game, it’s just like that. Bland, uninteresting, and boring. There is NO story, the battles are ridiculously boring (literally just press Enter like 5-6 times), and the characters have no personality whatsoever.
    I wouldn’t give this game more than 3/10.

  • kampinkarl48

    6th July 2011

    Gravatar

    “just another JRPG with a fresh coat of paint”?

    You give COD black ops a 9/10 even though that games differences with past COD’s can be counted on a single hand, so being bland and uncreative is great for shooters but JRPG’s have to be a spectacular, one of a kind experience to get a halfway decent score?

    Double standards make for non-credible reviewers.

  • Matt Wadleigh

    7th July 2011

    Gravatar

    Reviews have their own authors. This reviewer didn’t give Black Ops a 9/10. I did.

  • Danny

    14th July 2011

    Gravatar

    “Review” is an absolute joke. Just got the game on Steam, and it plays really well.

    COD:BO is a 9/10 and TLR is a 4/10? Stop gaming right now.

Show the sixteen other comments

Due to the age of this article, comments are now closed

You may also enjoy