Header image

Section 8: Prejudice

Xbox 360 review by Calvin Kemph on 20th April 2011

Captain Corde knows how to make an entrance. Pushing off from a ship that lingers in the sky, thousands of feet separate him from the underlying battlefields, where an all-out war has broken out over territorial control. An encampment of enemy Anti-Air turrets rattle off a procession of flak rounds clinking up against Corde’s heavy armor. Instinctively, he rolls out of his face-first suicide dive and sprawls out like so many flying squirrels, shifting his momentum away from the range of the turrets. Although his enhanced armor softens most of the blow, his landing on an enemy soldier takes care of the rest.

This is Section 8: Prejudice at its best. More than providing an exhilarating way to enter the frontlines, these drop-ins are an extension of those found in the original. This time they’re shown from the third person, providing more clarity concerning your character’s positioning in relation to his surroundings and accenting the speed. It essentially serves the same purpose as before, eliminating long wait screens and the annoyance of spawn kills in one fell swoop. It’s one of the aspects of Prejudice that’s found simple improvements and makes more sense for the direction of the series.

screenshot

The shift in scope from retail to digital distribution is mostly beneficial for the Section 8 franchise, with this second entry reeling in its map sizes, which are far more effective for what’s ultimately a tactical shooter. There’s also additional polish in the menus and the general presentation values backing the game. It’s all better organized and simpler. Nonetheless, there’s still the scattershot execution that comes as a side effect of trying to do too many things at once. Prejudice is in many ways an accumulation of all the decent concepts the first-person shooter genre has to offer. This inconsistency results in a pervasive lack of direction that still needs to be more focused to be competitive against any of the things it’s derived from.

The single-player is more substantial than that of its predecessor, with a more rigid – albeit incoherent – narrative that follows through with the story of Captain Corde. The first couple of levels are a bit disheartening. There’s a tutorial that takes place on a firing range, where Corde is asked to show new recruits the ropes, but it doesn’t feel particularly effective or well-designed. For instance, one segment has Corde jumping out of a plane. It’s explained he’s been doing this his whole life. The recruits should watch closely and learn from this experienced man. But after he’s jumped from the plane, all the recruits are already sky-diving ahead of him.

screenshot

There’s also this weird sense of linearity funneling you through each mission. It’s a race from checkpoint-to-checkpoint that serves its purpose as a primer for multiplayer but accomplishes little else. Step out of the invisible barriers and the screen flashes red, with a short countdown to your death if you don’t get back on track. The bigger problem is that the path is redefined after every checkpoint and punishes backtracking - if you ever decide to go change your weapon loadout at a supply depot, or anything, the game’s not into that. There’s only forward movement. Yet all around you, there are areas that look like they’d be worth exploring.

On the third level, objectives are scattered about in several locations and the map more-or-less opens up and a plane supplies an agile attack bike for jetting from place to place and evading the groups of enemies. This is exactly what Prejudice needs more of and even this turns into a bit of a letdown as you’re forced off the bike and have to jetpack into a claustrophobic cave afterwards. That’s sort of the way the whole campaign goes; you’re funneled from tutorial after tutorial and only do most things once or twice. Even then, the bike sequence is the most enjoyable piece of the campaign and most closely resembles the constant need for multi-tasking in the multiplayer. Following that, the missions all proceed along a predictable path, like a four hour tutorial supplemented with a vague sci-fi storyline.

screenshot

Things fare better in multiplayer, with familiar modes and concepts filling things out. There’s a bit of replay value in the Conquest mode alone, which divides up to 32 players into two teams with a focus on capturing each map’s control points. The content’s more varied than that though, as you’re being rewarded for everything you do (whether it is side missions, kills, or taking an enemy’s base) and accumulate funds that can go towards defensive drops, as well as vehicles. Apart from some more technical changes to weapons and some of the other gameplay aspects, it’s still the Section 8 you know and have reserved feelings about. If Prejudice enjoys a more vital community than the original, this could become a lot of fun, but it’s dependent on the community and for now, seems to crash whenever a good group is beginning to form. Of course, those spots could be filled in with bots, but that’s just not the same.

Prejudice also features a highly addictive Swarm mode, a survival-based game type that focuses on effective teamwork and resourcefulness with funds as it plays out increasingly tough rounds that relay the developer’s track record of great real-time strategy games. Building up systems of towers and holding off wave after wave of enemies can be a lot of fun and provides the kind of focused experience that would be good to see in any future modes. The main menu leaves a spot open for an unannounced upcoming mode, so here’s hoping for more of that, or something similar.

screenshot

Prejudice benefits from its transition into the digital marketplace, offering up a more focused and fully fleshed out experience than its retail predecessor. There’s some decent replay value across all the modes and with the suggestion of a fourth mode, this could become something worth sinking some time into. While it may not be a triumph of great game design, Prejudice can be pretty enticing at times, especially during the later waves of the Swarm mode and when you can get enough players, the Conquest mode. If there’s an audience out there to keep Prejudice afloat, that’ll be reason enough to check it out. It’s only too bad this series can’t get out of its own way at times, because there are moments when it’s pure fun and others that feel at odds with the rest of the package. As a whole, it’s a slightly above-average shooter occupying itself with too many worthwhile ideas for its own good.

Six out of ten

Spread the word

About the author

Calvin Kemph is an Associate Editor at Thunderbolt, having joined in July 2007. Get in touch on Twitter @Calvin_Kemph.

Comments

  • LZ

    21st April 2011

    Gravatar

    Wow. This reviewer is a grade A p12ick. This game is $15 bucks and is better than a lot of other games that I played this year. Graphically it is definitely dated but the game is amazingly fun for what you pay for it. Even if this game was priced at $60 bucks I would say it deserves a 7/10. @ $15 it is at least a 8/10.

    The game is a XBL title like Limbo, Braid, and Torchlight and I feel that it continues the tradition of quality for a low price. Your review of the game doesn’t justify the low score. You point out faults in it’s single player campaign but even a retarded blind kid could see that this game is meant to be played for it’s multiplayer the likes of Killzone 2 (NOT KILLZONE 3 - that game was such a let down to the KZ2 community).

    There was no reason to review this game as harshly as you did unless you have a personal grudge against the developers and want to see it’s metacritic score suffer. I MEAN FOR CHRIST SAKE IT IS A $15 DOLLAR GAME! WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT?!?!

  • Matt Wadleigh

    21st April 2011

    Gravatar

    I think you’re incorrect in saying that it is exclusively a multiplayer game. The developers went to great lengths during the promotion of this game to highlight what they considered a strong and engaging single-player experience. Though you may very well play games like this exclusively for the online portion, there are many others that will play it exclusively for the single-player and may come away disappointed. And considering the game’s price is meaningless when you can go to any store and by several other games with very strong multiplayer components for a similar price.

    We also have no grudges at all against the makers of the game.

  • SKitZZoiD

    24th April 2011

    Gravatar

    I agree, the reviewer is a douche and must have something against Timegate, the studio that makes this. The original, at double this price, got a 7 out of 10. This game, which according to the reviewer, improves upon the first in every category and is HALF the price, gets a 6 out of 10? Seriously? WTF? How is that possible?
    Also, this game has infintely more multiplayer replay value than any COD or other FPS type game. It doesn’t require hours and hours of practice just to get your twitch relfexes as good as some 12 year old japanese kid who plays 3-6 hours a day. It sublimely rewards strategy, intelligent thought, and teamwork. It levels the playing field perfectly. Which is very nice for a 30 something gamer or someone who doesn’t have good twitch reflexes.

  • HaywoodFloyd

    24th April 2011

    Gravatar

    I’m surprised no one has mentioned how INSANELY SIMILAR THE VISUALS LOOK TO HALO 3!

    I mean even the tall structures in the background, the weapons in their hands, the armor suit they’re wearing, i almost forgot i wasn’t looking at Halo 3!

    If it plays anything like Halo 3 then i’m sure it’s pretty good. The original didn’t quite feel right and didn’t catch on. Maybe if they’ve corrected a lot of their mistakes from the original this will catch on. Who knows!

Show the one other comment

Add your own comment »

You may also enjoy