Header image

Duke Nukem Forever

PS3 review by Ben Philpott on 10th June 2011

“Hail to the king, baby!”

That would be the king who, for technically over 13 years now, has remained absent from his throne. Duke Nukem Forever is everything videogames represent to the uneducated: it’s crass, violent, offensive and total throwaway entertainment but it also represents a satirical take on the videogame stereotype in the best form possible – an actual videogame. Our first glimpse of gameplay comes in the form of controlling the steroid junkie protagonist’s stream of piss into a urinal: tasteful. Following on, the player is thrown straight in the deep end with a boss fight, ending by breaking the fourth wall in true postmodern style with Duke himself playing the game from the comfort of his own living room (while the Olsen twins give him oral sex). The girls pull away and wipe their mouths, then ask the Duke was the game any good? He remarks “well after 12 fucking years it should be”; the nature of such self referential comedy sets the tone perfectly for a game which many didn’t expect to see the light of day.

screenshot

Honouring its status as the true sequel to Duke Nukem 3D, the game frequently makes light of past events, quickly playing up its setting as being 12 years after the last alien invasion. The narrative concerns the aliens return to the U.S, their ship curiously hovering with little indication of a desire for communication or invasion. It is soon after Duke receives a call from the President, who urges him not to engage the aliens for fears of disturbing any intergalactic relationship that may bore from their unexpected presence. The aliens eventually touchdown upon earth, only to head straight for a burger bar owned by the Duke, clearly indicating a less than hospitable agenda for their visit. Soon enough Duke’s apartment block is invaded and it’s up to him to send the alien scum home packing.

The game eases the player in comfortably, using various set pieces as a disguise for the tutorial prompts, no doubt a commonplace design choice in contemporary shooters. Duke’s controls are solid as expected but feel somewhat heavy handed and cumbersome in comparison to that of its marketplace rivals. Duke can often become unwieldy in times of intense combat, likely a relic of generations passed in the games lengthy development period. The game’s arcade-esque shooting mechanics are also juxtaposed by the ability to only carry two weapons at any given time. This makes things a little frustrating for those who just want to blast away with a wide arsenal at the push of a button, again, likely an odd design choice unresolved over the years (though Duke makes self-reference to this, occasionally exclaiming “you make me wish I had 3 guns!”)

screenshot

Thankfully, there’s more to the game than just straight up shooting, with an extensive range of tangible objects placed around Duke’s world to interact with, it’s unlikely the player will be left un-amused for long. These range from shooting some hoops, teasing an alien wall made of breasts, signing autographs, pinball machines, billiards tables and even more urinating. Various interactive moments also prove an advantage for the player with each one dispersing an ‘ego boost’, effectively contributing a power up to Duke’s overall health bar. Structurally, it tends to have more in common with old-school FPS classics than the games it satires. There is no ducking behind walls or weapon customisation and players are frequently given breaks from the shooting to take on quests at a more leisurely pace. An example being a chapter set almost entirely within a strip club, in which Duke must locate condoms, a vibrator and popcorn… that’s it.

The humour really comes alive from more than just a conceptual aspect, the script frequently attempts to be topical in a satirical sense and in many cases succeeds with hysterical results. Pop-culture parodies are rife and Duke wastes no time in ripping to shreds those who have taken his gaming crown in the last decade (green power armour is for pussies right?) Best are those placed subtly and take aim at events outside of gaming, a particular rant heard early in the game being case in point.

screenshot

From a visual standpoint, Duke seems to be lost in time; textures are frequently left looking grainy and unfinished while various models throughout the game are jagged and dated. However, taking into consideration the treatment Duke received in development and the delightfully vibrant art style, these are menial gripes. If anything, the visual handicaps are scars left from years of abuse and in a way represent a more humane trait to a game that is mostly just insensitive and crass. Either way, Duke Nukem Forever is still technically competent and does little to distract from the overall experience.

Multiplayer

Unfortunately, multiplayer was not available for evaluation at the time of writing. However, the game contains four different online multiplayer options: Dukematch (Deathmatch), Team Dukematch (Team Deathmatch), Capture the Babe (Capture the Flag) and Hail to the King (King of the Hill). Capture the Babe has been subject to some controversy due to its misogynistic gameplay, something we believe gamers will have to decide for themselves when it comes to game time.

Michael Csurics, responsible for the games sound design is another notable commendation to Duke Nukem Forever’s experience. Weapons sound meaty, Duke’s voice thunders through the speakers while the soundscape of the world around you only catalyses the humour further with some wonderfully offensive effects thrown in for good measure. The game’s voice talent is confidently tongue-in-cheek; as it should be, with any hamminess quickly flattened out by the next knock out one liner. As a whole, Csurics work is a strong part of Duke Nukem Forever’s success and indicates an optimistic future for his upcoming work on Star Wars: The Old Republic.

screenshot

Duke Nukem Forever feels like an anomaly; it’s wholly surprising to see the game in its complete package and even more so that it’s actually good. It was never going to be perfect but it hits a spot that’s been left unappreciated for an awfully long time. While the likes of Call of Duty and Crysis continue down the road to absolute realism, Duke Nukem Forever takes gamers back to remind about how to have fun; surely that’s why people play games? It does not set out to encapsulate the audience with its artistic flair or cinematic sensitivity but rather ensure you are always laughing. Where Portal 2 nailed wit, Nukem delivers in its ability to delivery unrelenting gross out humour at every corner and it most certainly works. Within the space of 12 months, we have had two of the funniest and most delightful games to ever see the light of day. It is difficult to articulate what has been achieved through Duke Nukem Forever’s humour but no doubt, the delays were worth it, if only to have gaming’s funniest year yet.

Eight out of ten

Spread the word

About the author

Ben Philpott is a Staff Writer at Thunderbolt, having joined in January 2008.

Comments

  • fusse

    10th June 2011

    Gravatar

    kinda side track comment but how does Crysis ever try to achieve realism with it’s “super powers” etc…

  • Ben

    10th June 2011

    Gravatar

    I used Crysis as an example due to the highly photorealistic graphics, whereas Duke Nukem is more in line with cartoon animation.

  • Josh

    10th June 2011

    Gravatar

    How were the load times? I’ve been hearing they are pretty long (for the 360 version).

  • Ben

    11th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Load times are ‘ok’, not Bayonetta bad but not amazing either.

  • Mike Conneely

    11th June 2011

    Gravatar

    How long is game and where would you rank the graphics compared to other games?

  • Moose

    12th June 2011

    Gravatar

    The load times are horrendous. On both systems. Its mainly due to the fact that anytime you die, the game has to reload everything and thats where the time goes. It does have the Duke Nukem 64 feel at times though :) its great.

  • Hoops

    12th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Umm this is an absolutely horrible review that is purely the writers opinion based solely on nostalgia alone. Comparing this game to Portal 2 is an absolute joke, and is the funniest thing I have heard this year. This reviewer is a joke, and I will never ever be back. Will be letting anyone and everyone not to come back either. Let’s review a game purely based on the fact that I enjoyed Duke Nukem when I was a little kid…. Well it’s just like when I was 9 years old! Amazing! 8/10! Games have matured, and 90% of gamers have matured as well. This stuff was fun in the 90’s, it’s not today. Go to another site for your review. Trust me, so far this game is about a 40% on the metacritic scale. Even lower if you take out this shoddy review.

  • Nicholas Williams

    12th June 2011

    Gravatar

    I feel you really understood Duke Forever. Good job :). More than I can say for IGN etc

  • Ben

    12th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Hoops.

    I never played Duke Nukem as a kid, this is my first experience playing a Duke Nukem game and I have only seen house mates playing DN3D. Sorry to offend you. Of course Portal 2 is a far more mature work, Duke Nukem I said is funny in a gross out and crass way which I make explicit light of at the beginning of the review. Your bizarre knee-jerk reaction to a difference in opinion is baffling.

  • Bjorn

    13th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Great review!

    The reason I play video games, and have been for the last 15 years is for the sheer fun of it. And in that department , DNF is unmatched this year.

  • Whodat587

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    HAHAHA

    This review got taken OFF of Gamerankings.com and is no longer part of the Metacritic scale. Which I find HILARIOUS because this review is pure trash. Many other respectable sites are giving this game 2 out of 10… A TWO… 2/10…. 20%… And you give it an 8? Based on what? You had fun for about 30 minutes…. But the game itself sucks. I have ‘fun’ throwing rocks in the lake when I’m bored, does that make than an amazing activity? You are ignoring the fact that the ‘game’ itself sucks majorly… and your reasons for giving it such a high score are purely based on your personal opinion rather than your professional video game standards. I agree with a lot of posts on here. This is pure trash. I won’t be back either.. Go to another site for your review. If you can stand admitting this game is garbage. 46% average review score on metacritic… Yea.. Enough said.

  • Stew

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    “your reasons for giving it such a high score are purely based on your personal opinion rather than your professional video game standards.”

    Last time I checked, reviewers do assess games purely based on personal opinion… but can you clarify what exactly are “professional video game standards”? If your answer is anything along the lines of ‘making sure reviews are similar to everybody else’s’ then you’re one lost little puppy.

    PS - There is another DNF review on here. Give that a read if you haven’t yet.

  • Timothy

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Did you even play the game?? I just got off of Digital Foundry’s review and comparison of the game… (the PS3 version being above and beyond the better version btw).. This game got a 3/10. It had problems like I have never seen a game have before. Let me quote a few for you (I will also provide a link to a real gaming website).

    ” Duke Nukem Forever in its final form is not a good game”

    ” it’s perhaps not surprising that Duke Nukem Forever looks and to a large extent plays like a game from long ago. Overall quality of the art often seems as if it hails from the late PlayStation 2 period”

    “this game doesn’t actually run in a high-definition resolution on either console platform.”

    “The game is a mess of shimmering jaggies and high-contrast edges and there’s very little in the way of post-processing (for example, motion blur or bloom) that would help to mitigate the very visible aliasing”

    “the game seems to have serious issues in streaming textures, to the point where sometimes it seems as if the code gives up, leaving ugly low-res artwork on-screen instead.”

    “The contrast with the PlayStation 3’s showing is remarkable. In an interview with the PlayStation Blog, Randy Pitchford talked about “amazing optimisations” for the PS3 version”

    “The PlayStation 3 version of the game makes these sections more fun to play, and even the meat-and-drink gunplay basics just feel better in comparison with the unfortunate 360 version.”

    “The Xbox 360 version of Duke Nukem Forever is nothing short of unmitigated disaster in this area, and easily one of the ugliest and most poorly performing shooting games we’ve tested in quite some time.”

    In short… Why did you write this review??? How embarrassing.

  • Timothy

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-duke-nukem-forever-face-off

  • Sean

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Every single quote you posted commented on the technical quality of DNF. I don’t think any of our writers would argue that DNF is a technical marvel - obviously it’s not. Just because it fails to run in ‘true high-definition’ - whatever that means - doesn’t mean the game can’t still be fun.

    The point of reviews is to reflect on a game through our own personal lens. Is it that hard for you to believe someone actually enjoyed the game?

    Differing opinions are healthy.

  • Raider88

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Wait, I’m a bit confused by this ^^^ post above.
    differing opinions are heatlthy? I come to sites to be well and knowledgeably informed about games before I make a 60$ investment. If a game is BAD I want to know the game is bad. I don’t want to know that ONE person enjoyed a very bad game. I think the above poster is far off in his comment about differeing opinions being a good thing. if a game is bad, and the collective majority agree it’s bad, in all likely hood it is a bad game. is that hard to undertand? i as well dont think i will be back after this. gg thunderbolt, you lost another.

  • S. Edberg

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Todays kids obviously can’t take in the power that is Duke and I feel sorry for the people who can’t appreciate this. And to all the people just looking at reviews and scores, you’re missing out on some good shit.

  • Sean

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    @ Raider88: If everyone else says DNF is a bad game and we say it’s not, you’re still going to believe it’s a bad game. Our one opinion isn’t likely to sway you.

    I’m not saying we’re here to offer differing opinions just to stand out, but do you really want every single outlet to have the exact same opinion on a game? What use is that to anyone?

    The real answer is you don’t want to be challenged by a different opinion, you don’t want to actually read the reviews and try and understand how someone felt so completely different about game compared to another writer.

    Enjoy reading the other fine gaming outlets!

  • Stew

    14th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Raider, that’s some real self destructive logic you follow. Games are not like buildings where they’re reviewed for safety, resulting in a unanimous decision.

    “if a game is bad, and the collective majority agree it’s bad, in all likely hood it is a bad game”

    No, if a collective majority believe a game is bad, then that’s all there is to it, nothing more. But for amusement sake lets use your logic towards some examples: FF7 and GTA3. There are vast majorities who believe that these games are the greatest ever made, and there’s also an equally vast majority who believe otherwise. Who is right? Do these games fall under good or bad? Whatever side you take, that’s called (drum roll) exercising your own opinion.

    People forget that review writers are gamers too, we just like to go out of our way to share our opinions, for better or for worse. Aiming to inform is not a perfect process because our own opinions have to be integrated in order to give it a human touch. Seriously, would you prefer a robot to calculate and measure a game’s statistics, in conjunction with the average human’s temperance and intelligence capacity just to give you numbers and statistics - helping you decide if you want to spend money? Even if that was to happen, it’s still your own responsibility to figure out your finances yourself, not ours. Is THAT hard to understand?

    But hey, if you don’t wanna come back, and if you want to stay mad that not everyone follows your flock mentality, that’s okay. Trust me, you won’t be missed.

  • Bruno Perissotti

    15th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Dude, WTF is wrong with these people??
    I didn’t get my hands of this game yet, but I see a lot of people taking it too seriously. They try to explain what’s FUN to the reviewer [who really understood what Duke's all about] or me or the knee-jerk dude himself like they are trying to explain how nanophysics work. And that’s the problem with games today. They are TOO SERIOUS… not an issue… but tge gamers are too serious too and forgot they’re only doing this to HAVE FUN!! Great review. Keep it up, Ben. Keep it Duke!!

  • Bruno Perissotti

    15th June 2011

    Gravatar

    BTW, I was cheking the review on Gamespot and was stunned with what I found. When roaming the other reviews, I found this site that gave 8/10 to Duke. And I wanted to check the review - are these guys freakishly insane or they’re the only site that truely understood Duke? - and so I discovered Thunderbolt. And after THIS particular review, I’ve become your newest reader. Congrats, guys!! You nailed Duke [that's only possible metaphorically speaking. Duke is un-nail-able].

  • Jerry Porter

    15th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Bruno Perissotti…..

    You are most likely a narrow minded, shallow, immature 13 year old who claims to be an X Bot 360 Gaymer… The console of choice for little kids and Gaymers alike. It is cheap (cheaply mad that is) and you can actually afford it, and feel like you are a part of the crowd.

    This game on the other hand… It is bad. I understand your point… Saying that this site understood the game… You can understand the game, appreciate it for what it is trying to accomplish… But that does not change the fact that this is an absolute horrible game. It IS Duke Nukem.. It can bring back memories, we can all understand that.. But this particular game IS bad. The graphics are some of the worst seen this gen (especially the 360 version) the controls are botched, the story might be enjoyed by a 13 year old who is jacked up on all kinds of mood elevator medications, or simply immature teens who are slightly retarded. You can appreciate Dukes history, that does not change that this is a poorly made and produced game. I don’t see how you don’t understand that. You might enjoy the game, but it is possible that you are enjoying a very bad game. Some people do enjoy bad games, that why a lot of ‘bad’ games sell hundreds of thousands of copies. In this case, you are defending this particularly bad game, with reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of the game itself. You cannot review a game purely on whether you ‘enjoyed’ it or not. A review needs to take into consideration the technical aspect, the art direction, the audio quality, the story, and generally the overall appeal of the game. In the end, agreed on my 95% of review sites and gamer reviews as well, this is one of the worst games of ALL TIME. Not just a bad game, but one of the worst to ever be released to the public. If you are going to defend a game like that… You sir, need to have your brain examined.

  • Bruno Perissotti

    15th June 2011

    Gravatar

    Dear JERKy Porter…

    I am a 29-years old professor of a top University in Brazil. I am a Ph.D. in my field, having more than ten articles published in 4 mid-level scientific periodics that reach half of the globe. I study Physiological Herpetology. I own a PS3 and that does not matter.

    And what you and the entire gaming community seems to have missed is that FUN is relative. I’ve played games that received 8s, 9s, 10s all around the web that I simply could not enjoy.

    So what if I’m enjoying a bad game [Now, I have the game, played it and I'm loving it]? Can’t you live with the fact that I’m liking it? Do you have to insult me? You have to call me GAYmer? Can’t you live with the fact that someone has an idea that differs from your own?

    To me, the idea of narrow-minded person is someone who cannot accept ideas that contrast with the one he’s supposed to believe and can’t let anyone else believe in anything different. You sound just like DarksydePhyl, the ultimate WhiteTrashGamer stereotype to me.

    That was the last of my comments. Arguing about what IS FUN or what’S NOT is ridiculous. I’ll go overthere and play some more.

  • Richard

    16th June 2011

    Gravatar

    I heard you can pee on stuff in this game… awesome!

  • Stew

    16th June 2011

    Gravatar

    You can also pick up and toss poo.

  • Richard

    17th June 2011

    Gravatar

    You couldn’t do that in Killzone 3. It was the main reason I gave that game a 5.

  • TheNintendoFan

    22nd June 2011

    Gravatar

    Every “big” critic disses this game. It actually seems good.

  • Guymar Dudikoff

    23rd June 2011

    Gravatar

    Man, what a buncha knob polishers. Who are these other comments and where do they come from? Let me paraphrase the discussion so far:

    “You gave Duke Nukem an 8 and other websites are giving it a 2! Your score should be adjusted to reflect what other sites gave, so speaks anonymous jerkoff, acting authority on all things!”

    “If I buy Duke Nukem and you liked it and I don’t, I’m out $60 and you’re liable and I’ll sue. After all, buying a game new after reading ONE SINGLE REVIEW is the smart and sensible thing to do, right?”

    Yeah, sorry, I mean, what do you say to that kinda stuff eh? People are entitled to their opinions. Anyone who feels the need to trash someone’s has some serious insecurity. Maybe they should introduce base therapists in the next Halo for these types

  • Nerdbasher2000

    28th October 2012

    Gravatar

    Good review, I played this game on ps3 and I loved every second of it, such a refreshing change to the normal would never be appreciated by and large by the gaming community as a whole but those of us who played the original duke nukem 3d and loved it can appreciate the subtle tongue in cheek humor the overt crassness and the backwards retro flavour this game provides. The game is not without a few technical issues however but no game is perfect, I am willing to overlook the long loading times and rough texture here and there because its duke, and duke would probably tell those who nitpick to suck it up and grow a pair, besides… Long loading times give me a chance to drink my beer and scratch my balls… Long live the king baby!

  • DedelePd

    17th November 2012

    Gravatar

    So the game is 20$ in the psn store in my country. Should i buy it or not? Knowing that I fell in love with DN3D and played it dozens of time. Does it have the same feeling as the old Duke, are the level design somewhat similar or very different?

Show the twenty-seven other comments

Add your own comment »

You may also enjoy