Proposed rule change

[Phil]

Justin's done an excellent job over the last three months, but I didn't really expect someone to keep winning the Review of the Month competition like he has! To make it a little more interesting and to keep if from becoming stale, I'm proposing a new rule similar to the one we have for Staff Member of the Quarter (should you know what that is!):

If you win two months in a row, you're not eligible for the following month.

What do you think?

[Triggerhappytel]

Sounds fine. At least this way someone else might stand a chance to win :p

[Phil]

So would anyone object to this new rule?

[James]

Not at all.

[Triggerhappytel]

So would anyone object to this new rule?

Not at all.

Justin might ;)

[Arkrex]

Speaking of the devil, where has he been lately?

[Disco]

Nah, I don't mind. Gotta let the others have a turn. =D

And I'm around. I've just run out of newer games to review; everyone's already taken what I would have covered. >.>

[Arkrex]

A turn? Psh, I know you know that I was gonna take it from you regardless!! Haha :) Yeah, gotta play games to review them... and lately I'm finding the ones worth playing take too long to get through ergh.

[iamtheprodigy]

That's my problem, Arkrex. Except instead of my complaint being that they're too long it's that they're too expensive. :X